Nikki Glaser’s Diddy Joke at the 2025 Golden Globes: What She Said and the Reaction

Diddy’s legal woes and lavish lifestyle collided with Nikki Glaser’s sharp wit at the 2025 Golden Globes, resulting in a controversial joke that ignited social media and sparked a debate about the boundaries of comedy.

The Joke That Rocked the Globes

The 2025 Golden Globes were supposed to be all glitz and glamour, but comedian Nikki Glaser threw a curveball with a risqué joke aimed at Sean “Diddy” Combs, who was conspicuously absent due to ongoing legal troubles. Glaser’s joke, which riffed on Diddy’s alleged penchant for “freak-off” parties, landed with a mixed reaction, with some laughing while others cringed.

While the exact wording of the joke remains elusive due to the lack of readily available video footage, reports suggest Glaser insinuated that Diddy offered men money to engage in sexual acts with their partners. She contrasted this with a hypothetical Stanley Tucci gathering, suggesting it would involve “lots of olive oil” instead of “baby oil.” This juxtaposition of Diddy’s alleged behavior with Tucci’s wholesome image likely fueled the controversy. The camera panned to a visibly uncomfortable Tucci, adding another layer of awkwardness to the moment.

Diddy’s Legal Cloud and the Joke’s Context

At the time of the Golden Globes, Diddy was facing serious accusations, including sex trafficking and racketeering, allegations he vehemently denied. These legal troubles provided a charged backdrop for Glaser’s joke, making it feel less like a harmless jab and more like a pointed commentary on his alleged conduct. This context is crucial to understanding the ensuing public reaction and the debate about the joke’s appropriateness.

The Internet Explodes: Public Reaction and Debate

As expected, social media lit up with opinions. Some lauded Glaser’s boldness, while others condemned her insensitivity. The joke became a lightning rod for discussions about the boundaries of comedy, particularly when the target is facing serious allegations. The lack of a definitive video clip further complicated matters, leading to different interpretations and fueling online speculation.

Adding to the intrigue, Glaser later revealed other jokes cut from her set, including one connecting Diddy to the still-unsolved Luigi Mangione murder case. The decision to axe this even more controversial material hints at the network’s awareness of the potential for backlash.

The Lingering Questions

The Nikki Glaser/Diddy incident raises important questions about the role of comedy in addressing sensitive topics. Does humor have a place in holding powerful figures accountable? Where do we draw the line between edgy and offensive? And how does social media amplify and distort these conversations?

This joke, whether deemed funny or foul, has cemented its place in Golden Globes history. It serves as a reminder that comedy can be a powerful tool, but one that must be wielded with care, especially in the court of public opinion.

Diddy’s Silence and the Unseen Jokes

Diddy has remained publicly silent on the matter, leaving the public to interpret the joke and its implications. Glaser’s revelation of the even more audacious cut jokes, including the one mentioning the Luigi Mangione case, further complicates the narrative. Why were these jokes cut? Were they deemed too risky by network executives, or did they simply not fit the overall tone of the show? These unanswered questions add another layer of mystery to the incident.

The Search for the Video and the Ongoing Conversation

The absence of an easily accessible video of the joke is a notable aspect of this story. It contributes to the ambiguity surrounding the event and allows for varied interpretations. The search for the video continues, and its potential emergence could reignite the conversation and provide more clarity on the exact wording and delivery of the joke.

The Nikki Glaser/Diddy joke highlights the challenges of navigating humor in the age of social media, where jokes can quickly go viral and spark intense scrutiny. It underscores the importance of context, intent, and audience reception in determining the appropriateness and impact of comedy, particularly when dealing with sensitive subjects. This incident is likely to be analyzed and debated for years to come, serving as a case study for the evolving relationship between comedy, celebrity culture, and public accountability.